Here is proof of everything I’ve been saying about women: women are incredibly fucking stupid, don’t comprehend the world — economics, politics and just about anything at all — do not belong in public life and should not be able to vote.
From that video, it should become quite clear that being female is synonymous with being dumb. Being a woman itself is a mental illness.
These are truisms that have outlasted thousands of years of human existence, in every single nation, culture and society. It isn’t a matter of belief. It is a first principle based on FACTS! It is reality!
As a first principle, we must always remember that women are stupid and everything that follows after their interference or whatever comes out of their value system is going to be just as dumb. Needless to say, there are men who are just as dumb who will fall for the Feminine chicanery.
If most men would just adhere to one very crucial first principle — women are stupid — and act accordingly, they would be fine within their interactions with women.
For me, there’s no point in interacting with women, so what I write here about these front holes are going to be for the sake of edification of men.
Because the main preoccupation of women is “being nice” and telling them these truths about themselves will only result in banality — quips, buzz words and catch phrases to insult and shame. They can’t think for themselves and are not about learning anything, because women are not political no matter how much they pretend to be. They cannot debate and all they care about is themselves, so they cannot ever care about politics or rational debate beyond how it affects them, or how it makes them feel. None of it has anything to do with processing information. NONE OF IT!
They possess no interest in understanding how things essentially work. Only how it benefits them.
Yet, why? Why are they this way? Why are women so retarded and so stupid?
It is quite simple, actually.
Men take more risks and we are more aware of dangers than women are. This is due to the fact that we are biologically equipped with inclinations towards interacting with the outside world. It is how we have evolved, the reason why we are far more intelligent than women and why everything women know is due to us, men.
Women are biologically risk averse. They are not risk takers and thousands of years cannot be undone in less than 100 years of having women out in the public sphere where they do not belong. Women being risk averse means they are more susceptible to dangers and often misjudge and misapprehend possible threats. More importantly, being risk averse means there is hardly ever any learning curve, if any at all; psychological growth — maturation — never truly occurs. Women are perpetually children, therefore neotenized. A simple fact of life is, women just have not evolved to interact with the outside world as men have, so much of the chaos that comes from The Feminine, in society, is due to this emergent biological fact.
Women believe “being nice” is a virtue. “Being nice” is an expression for what is known as “Agreeableness” in psychology.
Were “being nice” to be treated as a virtue, in the Aristotelian sense — the Aristotelian mean — being nice would be an extreme. A deficiency in being nice — not being nice — can also be an extreme, but there’s one major problem with this. “Being nice” is subjective, hence it can never be a virtue, but a value. Values can be anything, therefore not concretely defined. Clearly, this is the case within the modern gynotopic nightmare we currently live in, where anything can be misconstrued as not being nice. What’s worse, there is never a balance in how much niceness is required or doled out. With women, niceness is always on either ends of the spectrum — extremes — nice or not nice — never a balance or in the middle, disregarding the concept of tradeoffs. One is always desired, of course, while the other is illusory, based on subjective emotionality and inability to deal with hard truths. They treat being nice as a moral absolute.
For instance, your wife asks you if she looks fat in a dress and you tell her, yes or perhaps, you skirt around it a bit by suggesting that the dress doesn’t bring out her best features; she more than likely will interpret this as you calling her fat and she’s mad at you for the rest of the week.
Or, your mom asks you how’s her cooking and you give her an honest critique; she picks your plate up and throws the food in the sink, or at best, she’s upset with you, too. Your female friend seeks out your advice and you are very candid and honest with her about herself and the poor choices she makes, she slowly starts distancing herself from you.
You’d probably say women are stupid, and you’d be right, because “women are stupid” is an all encompassing first principle in comprehending and efficiently dealing with them (if you are doomed to). It is also self evident and a truism that every single man encounters several times in his life when he has to interact with them. Yet, still, believe it or not, and luckily for you guys reading this, there is an explanation for this stupidity.
The reason women will get upset in those and many other similar scenarios is, women punish honesty. Yes! Believe it or not, women prefer lies. Lies that they want to hear and do not appreciate truth and honesty. Mind you, majority of the times they are not even aware that they are being lied to, just as long what is said to them is favorable and makes them feel cozy and tingly inside. As long as it’s nice.
Telling them the truth, essentially isn’t what they value (they only “value” it when it can be emotionalized and weaponized to create misery and make themselves a victim, as a result of not being able to handle the truth), especially when it doesn’t make them feel warm, cozy and tingly inside (tee hee hee). So, being truthful about whatever at the moment, as long as it is not in tandem with their desires, means you’re not being nice. Even if they say they appreciate your honesty, they truly do not and this is because, psychologically women think themselves to be perfect. Perfect, angelic beings who are dainty and can never do wrong and when you are honest — when you tell them the brutal honest truth (including the fact that they aren’t perfect) you’re in violation of the Niceness Doctrine. Rest assured, they will lie to you, too in order to never tarnish that image of perfection and perpetual self righteousness.
Bro, they will lie, hide, deflect and safe guard when they are caught in lie and may even cry rape or domestic violence once their bullshit is exposed.
It is therefore, safe to conclude that women cannot handle reality or truth and being nice is a subjective feminine construct that is based on what a woman wants and feels. Another way to look at it would be to understand that women expect men to be like women in their interactions — Agreeable — always, dumb. When they interact with other women, their goal in being nice is to stir up the warm, bubbly “tee hee hee” inside. Therefore, being honest, “being real”, reality are at odds with the feminine experience.
Moreover, it is also quite apparent that women are naturally inclined to keep up appearances to minimize conflict, due to the fact that they are risk averse, as mentioned before. This, again, is a biological function, perhaps used to minimize chances of death. In doing so, they have made “being nice” a virtue, but only in the sense of virtue signalling, otherwise they wouldn’t act like cunts in private, behind closed doors. It is all a charade. Pretentiousness and deceit. All evolutionary tactics of deception.
This is why they view nice guys in a negative light, because women use niceness as a way to manipulate others, so they think men who are nice to them are being nice to manipulate them.
For some, there are genuinely nice women, yet, for many this is just not the reality.
Women’s preoccupations in life, as a result of the “niceness” doctrine inherent to The Feminine — that which is destroying our planet — is the delusion of infinite happiness — glitz, glamor and giggles; “tee hee hee”, all to manipulate. This is why telling women “NO!” results in a meltdown and malfunction. The word “no” prohibits their pursuit of infinite happiness (knocks them back into reality) and curtails their abilities to manipulate. To them, “no” is inherently not nice.
This is how women fuck children and families up. Especially little boys. Then they wonder why some men are so effeminate and behave like women; like children. Women themselves are children and like children, cannot stand being told “No!” They think their kids should never experience moments of displeasure or unhappiness and project this insanity onto their kids and their kids turn into rotten, spoiled little manipulative shit bags who have barely made it out of the womb, yet think they understand the world and have these lofty expectations of society.
For women, the harsh realities of life are merely illusions, or worse, problems they can solve with a little sprinkle of “tee hee hee” and infinite pleasure here and there. Sometimes, “awww”, and “ooh yeeeah” and cooing like a baby helps to manipulate the outcomes they seek. Therefore, the issue with women and the Niceness Doctrine is less about being nice, but more about feigning niceness and manipulation.
In addition, as you have heard that dumb bitch in the video, women want to mommy everyone and everything disregarding the realities of tradeoffs in life. It is all or nothing. Everything is binary for them.
Yes, women are primitive, psychologically inept mental midgets who should have never been allowed to vote or be in public life. With such psychological inclinations, is it any wonder why the societies and the world at large as we live in is in such a mess? Women have totally destroyed the balance of society with their preoccupation with being nice, so much so that the truest essence of meaning and understanding of a thing — anything — could never be learned nor understood by them. Be it politics, economics, education, science or philosophy; they can never be truly grasped by a creature whose main driving forces are pretentiousness and manipulation. Yet, we have mangina faggot ass mommy men assisting them in fucking us all over.
I’m sorry, but just like how no one can convince me that a person who believes in virgin births and a human rose from the dead after being murdered is intelligent, so too can they never convince me that women are intelligent.
Nope! Sorry. Sell That shit somewhere else, because this guy isn’t buying it. No sir!
Of course, as with everything, there are exceptions and sometimes the exceptions are the best rules. I will never deny this, yet it certainly depends on what we mean by the “the best rules”. When and how do they apply?
Were we to surmise “not all women are stupid” (which is certainly true) and those women who aren’t stupid to be the exceptions, and we posit that these exceptions “ought” to be the rule, are we suggesting that we ignore the actual rule; (that women are generally stupid) ignore what is common and general; pretend that what we actually see and our experiences aren’t so? Because, this is essentially how the female mind works and what women do and expect of the others — they ignore what is clear, obvious and blatant about them — they expect (men and women) to lie and cosign their fantasies. This applies to how they view and interact with the outside world, too. They pretend that whatever is, to not be as it is, but that it is not the way it is, and just as long as there are enough dumb ass women (sorry for the redundancy) around to pretend that what is to not actually be as it is, then it ceases to be what it is.
Women are truly incredibly stupid creatures and this retardation — failed mental gymnastics — is almost a misplaced power of sexual seduction that is extended to the outside world. Like that person who thinks he or she can charm anything and bend it to their will. They don’t understand the predator/prey dynamic, and believe their weaknesses and sexual dimorphic inadequacies will be rewarded, because they have to pretend and have coaxed others into pretending along with them, that there are no sexual dimorphic inadequacies. However, she knows there are, but she will invoke them conveniently when and if the reward for doing so is high, but pretending there is no sexual dimorphic inadequacies is her main preoccupation and disposition — in order to be like a man — the Female Animus.
Women think by virtue of their femininity — their femaleness — these things can be achieved. Their femininity being, having to pretend that whatever is so, isn’t so and they have the psychological comfort of knowing that society (men) will be there to catch them when they fall and bail them out for their stupidity. Thereby activating and utilizing the lying and pretending expectations she superimposes.
This is why their sense of danger is totally uncalibrated. The lion, to her, isn’t going to shred her stupid ass to pieces. No, it is little kitty that only needs to be cuddled and “shown affection”. Likewise, the bad boy only needs to be tamed. Pretend that the lion and the bad boy aren’t who and what they are, but are both in need of the supposed inherent virtues that are inveterate to her make up as a woman.
Again, women believe themselves to be the cure and answers to all the world’s ills (what she deems as ills — perceived ills — people, things and circumstances that need “fixing” and can only be “fixed” through her interventions).
So, no, we must never use the exceptions to the rule in that manner — as a way to ignore the general consensus and commonalies.
Instead, we must say, yes, generally women are retarded, solipsistic cretins that don’t understand themselves or the world, but there are exceptions — women who are indeed intelligent, objective and perceptive — and these exceptions ought to be the rule. Meaning, more women ought to be like them. Yet we fall into another dilemma — an is ought fallacy.
Considering the social landscape and climate of our society, anyone who disagrees with the statement, “women deserve to be beaten”, is a cerebral insufficient who isn’t paying attention, nor understand what is going on in the world.
Yet, it never fails. Women, like petulant children — their responses are always going to be geared towards being trite. Employing psychological guesswork and shaming language at every turn when their stupidity is pointed out. Hence, there can never be any introspection. NOTHING will change for the better, if change for the better is left up to women.
They must be beaten and caged, or ALL our lives will be destroyed even further.
To me, the word NICE is a dumbed down word for STUPID. Men should not use the words NICE, KIDS, and a whole slew of four letter words. Your vocabulary can limit the quality of your life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, how about the use of the word “cute”. Women use this word to describe handbags and shoes!
When I think of the word cute, I think of a baby or furry animal that causes you to bite your lips and make you want hug and squeeze it, with affection.
Just imagine, when women use the word “cute”, to describe a handbag or a pair of shoes, that these articles of clothing (articles of vanity and stupidity) makes them feel the way I just described.
They really are fucking stupid.
It is similar to this phenomenon that is going on with YouTube Tech reviewers — referring to laptops, graphics cards and whatever tech they’re reviewing, as “sexy”.
Wtf do you mean, pal? What do you mean that the laptop is “sexy”? That it gives you sexual urges?
A bunch of dumb faggot, she-men on YouTube.
Great read. One example I encountered recently of how absolutely fucking ridiculous women are with regards to being generally annoying and undermining established frameworks or rules is the website “girlsaskguys.” The whole premise of the website is for GIRLS to ASK GUYS — in other words — GUYS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE ONES ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS. However, girls respond to the questions and the website even emphasizes “best answers from girls” as well as guys but from what I saw, the girl answers were usually featured more prominently than the guys. Reddit is the same way too. For instance, I wanted to post a question in subreddit directed at men and I found one called “askmen” or something to that effect. One of the moderators was a “transgender” (female-to-male) even though the entire point is that it is supposed to be discussion overseen by men. That website is such a cancerous, feminized piece of trash that kills discussion and freedom of thought. The reason I stumbled onto the aforementioned subreddit is because my post was automatically taken down from the main “askmen” subreddit that has a few million members. I messaged the mod to ask why it was automatically taken down because the rule that was cited was so trite, semantic and idiotic. “He” (not sure if it was a guy — kind of sounded like a soyboy) responded in this bitchy way without answering my question of what does the rule mean. It was just a series of pointless brief quips to my well-articulated questions about what the rule meant. Of course to start off he(?) responded: “there’s a reason we included ‘chill out, it was automated’ without any other word, prolonging the exchange like a fag. Of course I had to reiterate that I understood it was automatically censored by a bot but the bots only take things down based on the paramaters that are given. Everything now is so automated and passive aggressive. Every time there’s a problem with something no matter what it is or where you go, there’s always this shift of blame on a system that doesn’t function properly. And of course nobody anywhere ever understands a grievance no matter how well you articulate yourself. Every customer-facing role with any corporation is always some stupid bitch that can’t comprehend intelligent language. They never fucking listen and you always have to repeat yourself multiple times when complaining or explaining anything. And if you find yourself in female-dominated work environments — God have mercy on your soul. Women are the most retarded, useless dipshit people when it comes to anything professional. And while working remotely? Christ, you might as well be working with a bunch of clucking chickens. They don’t understand your messages and you always end up repeating yourself. Their work ethic is poor. The supervisors are weak, fake and passive aggressive. Favortism is rampant. Nothing is fair and everything super dainty and fake on the surface but rotten and dysfunctional underneat. I wish cunts would be expelled from all corproations, institutions and especially anything academic. All of the stupid bitch teachers I ever had fit your descriptions with 100% applicability. Entire generations of men have been utterly devastated and feminized by shitty stupid bitch teachers and mothers. Fuck the west.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have just described all of the Ivy League cunts that are prevalent in our society. I know, because I’m related to one. You are 100% correct. Society is now shaped by The Feminine — stupid women who have been allowed to believe that their stupidity is meaningful.
Absolutely. They are so dull and painfully unaware of how unoriginal their “ideas” are. They really think as a monolith, thinking they are fighting the system when they are merely repeating what they’ve been indoctrinated with. This one bitch I worked with told me she was part of an activist group that promotes “body positivity”. In that remote work environment, they had us partake in cringe-inducing activities like we were elementary school themed around the current holiday. After halloween and thanksgiving, christmas was next and the same bitch kept trying to raise an issue over anything being “christmas-themed” and constantly kept reminding us to scrub the term christmas from anything despite the fact nobody was against it and she didn’t do the same thing for halloween or thanksgiving. I maintain a cautious belief in god personally — I don’t know the exact names or specifics — so I wasn’t offended as a christian, it’s just that the glaring hypocrisy was infuriating. I see christmas as a western tradition and not a big deal. Women are so stupid and incapable of debate because they lack the intellectual capacity to understand what’s being said in a conversation. They are emotionally-centered and cannot even attempt objectivity. They are irrational and selfish which is why they make the worst leaders. You have no idea how bad it is in college classrooms these days. Every class has some stupid bitch who tries to debate everything and it always sounds like she is reciting the huffington post or something. Everyone these days in academic settings for the most part is totally feminized in the same way. It’s really out of control now. Especially irritating is how women get top bill for fucking everything, especially on the internet or any kind of publicity. If you look up any topic on youtube the results are thumbnail after thumbnail of some dumb bitch who doesn’t know what she’s talking about. If you want a great book to read check out Michael Crichton’s “Disclosure” from 1992. He was so far ahead of the curve and was attacked even back then for writing that book. Also watch his first charlie rose interview about it. That kind of literature probably couldn’t even get released today and it resonates now more than ever. The story is set in Seattle and having lived there I can tell you, every fucking job is female dominated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched that interview with Michael Crichton — the man is absurd and out of his mind!
He essentially says that men and women are the same with regards to their behaviors; that women politicians are no different to male politicians and there is no difference between men and women when it comes to power. The interview is propagandist in the sense that it is trying to promote “Woman for President”. “Where do you think this is going? Do you think near in the future in the workplace we’ll have some sort of “Sex Free” ?” Charlie Rose asks. Nothing this man says in this interview is remotely connected to reality and how it works within the male/female dynamics, except the part about shaking hands. He’s worried that he’s seen as anti feminist???
Crichton said that before the experiment of allowing women into top-flight positions in the work place that it was expected women would be more nuturing in their managerial or leadership roles but as it had turned out they were tyrannical and aggressive cunts as executives or business leaders. He’s saying they are attempting to behave like men and makes a fairly plain case women do not behave stereotypically as one would expect because this whole feminist movement to include them in the workplace has turned them into monsters, which is what his book was about. To suggest there was anything propagandistic about the interview is really bizarre. You’re just too extreme in your views because western women are so awful. (Which they are, but calm down.) Not everything with a nuanced perspective is “propaganda”. The entire premise of his book is that women get special treatment and the criminal justice system is biased in favor of women — as well as corporate America — and many bad actors exploit this to their advantage. He was humoring the notion that we are fundamentally the same in order to make an argument women should be treated as such, i.e. getting the same treatment as men in sexual harrassment cases. You have some good commentary on here but you’re so extreme — especially when you say things like women need to be beaten — it comes like you’re a shill and/or an angry incel. Maybe both? You kind of sound like you are out of YOUR mind. Maybe a bit too entrenched in your angry views or you’re insincere, I knew there was a reason your page was at the top of the search engine results when I looked up this topic…. If it doesn’t apply it doesn’t apply but you definitely have raised red flags. At least you know what you are. Best of luck to you in your rants.
I’m so happy you explained this, because he was a bit incoherent and I had to replay him a few times to actually get what he was trying to say. Nonetheless, I came away with what I iterated earlier. Thank you for explaining it.
In addition, many, including him, seem to think that feminism is an entity unto itself when the reality about feminism is that it is Female Biology Gone Political. This is why most believe that women are being acted upon and that “changes” are causing women to act and behave in a particular manner. This is absurd. It is suggesting that women are by nature pure and untainted until they are corrupted. No. What we have seen and continue to see is Female nature as it is when allowed free roam. When taking the usual position that he (Michael Crichton) and many others take — that Female nature is being tainted and corrupted — one ends up in a very weird and awkward place where much of the critique of women is seen as extreme. The critiques of women I proffer aren’t extreme, but are common sense, empirical observations and not a vocation born of the wanton desire to create some mythical coexistence between men and women that supposedly semblances a Ying and Yang. Essentially, many people — men — are so caught up in trying to be nice and to not be criticized when it comes to speaking the truth about women for fear of being labeled “extreme”, that they attempt to create some leeway in order to not appear as being extreme. The truth is the truth, regardless of someone’s opinions of the truth and the person telling the truth , being regarded as “extreme”. Then there’s the nonsensical use of the term “Incel” which is a dead giveaway of person who has almost no understanding of how far gone our societies are as a result of FEMALE BIOLOGY GONE POLITICAL; then “angry views” which is such a feminized attempt at shaming as if anger is some kind of faux pas and unacceptable emotion. The preoccupation with that it is and the weaponization of it being an unacceptable faux pas, indicates feminization to an alarming degree.
As far as beating women is concerned in order to change society, many of you seem to think that women can be reasoned with. This is hilarious! It isn’t that my views are extreme, but the methodology of behavior modification is; an extreme measure is needed to cure an extreme situation. This is common sense, but the retorts are definitely Feminine. I am not surprised.
One thing is for is sure and that is, you took a complete 180 when one of your sacred cows was critiqued. It is fascinating, because it seems as though you took offense.
In the end, it doesn’t matter what Michael Crichton has to say, as long as his premise — that men and women behave the same — is false. That statement is untrue, regardless of it being a broad statement, or within a specific context. Under no circumstances are male and female behaviors the same.
Nonetheless, thank you for your readership and your recommendation.
WTF?!!! are u having a discussion if women should have power in our “democratic” society? This is absolutely old school…lol Of course I know that US for instance is a kind of dark medieval in this matter since there has not yet been any of this sort at the political stage but wow… LOL I know that there is psykopats of both sexes but that has nothing to do if a woman should have the same right or opportunity as men. I would maybe go as far as say Women should be in power and that we surely need a shift from patriarch into matriarch because the first has shown that it doesn´t work 🙂
Your contribution here, alone, proves that it is a terrible idea.
This article has touched on basically every thought I’ve ever had about women. I love my wife, but she’s a fucking idiot. She’s educated but not smart. She’s a kindergarten teacher and the way she talks about her job you’d think it’s some combination of rocket science and Alaskan crab fishing. I’m honestly surprised she’s never seriously injured her shoulder with the frequency and vigor in which she pats herself on the back. You’re 100% right that their value system places an emphasis on niceness. As a result most are unable to deal with high pressure, stressful situations and are unable to function in changing environments. Unless of course, a man is there to literally hold their hand and guide them while saying encouraging things like “you’re doing great” and “you got this”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is fucking awesome and spot on!!! “A patriarch society doesn’t work”? My question is, “who the hell built this society?” The females? Rivers were crossed and built bridges over (problem solved) females bitched and stayed put. Mountains were traversed, flattened made into fuel, products, etc. Females bitched. Men looked at the stars and said, “what is that stuff, I want to go there!” MEN designed and built the rocket, rode in it, got there and returned!(not counting all the support structure, math etc) Females bitched. Even look to the Bible (I am not a peddler but supportive) “NO MAN SHALL BE UNDER A WOMAN!” Hmm, this is the know all creator of EVERYTHING? My opinion is in HIS court! One that designs things usually has the inside tract. But because of all the previously mentioned info, these jackassed politicians corrupting everything, we are where we are today. Again look back to the Bible, and how deceptive these females can be. This is why I kind of believe we just may be at the end of times. Even the respect I have had for my sister, proves this now. Don’t generate wealth, take someone else’s and piss it away. “open air house” , trips, squander the future. Men will live in squalor to make advances, females want to piss shit away to be “comfortable”.(unless they are trying to procure resources) ( they will endure all kinds of “discomforts” (high heels,tight clothing,sun,etc)for said resources) until such resources are acquired. I had a few friends were going to get married, I told them they had rocks in their heads. just give them all your shit and call it a day!
Thanks for your time, Holmes
LikeLiked by 1 person