If you thought that sluts had so much power that they couldn’t possibly demand more, then you are a dumb retard.

Sluts could have you locked in a medieval dungeon, being tortured with an iron maiden, and they would still claim you are oppressing them and that you have to make more concessions.

The standard female technique of using their sexuality to oppress and exploit men and then claiming that mentioning that they are doing that is oppression against them is still an active tactic used aggressively. It is no different to Jews claiming that you pointing out facts and truths about them is antisemitism.

All this would imply that those male teachers are heterosexual.

Dumb.

The male teachers should have spat on these sluts.

“If teens midriffs distract you, you should not be working with teens” is the most retarded statement possibly ever made.

A 16-year-old girl is fully sexually developed. Any heterosexual male is going to be distracted by a teenage girl showing off her body. This is literally sexual harassment of men.

This “age of consent” gibberish is now reaching into mythological realms. The male teacher’s inherent biological drives are supposed to recognize that she hasn’t had her 18th birthday yet, and then stop being distracted by her body based on that?

(Also, I think the age of consent is actually 16, but okay – whatever. It doesn’t matter. The point is, if a woman’s body is sexually developed, it is not possible for a man’s sexual system to not be distracted by her partially nude body.)

Consent theory is now entering into total voodoo realms. “Age of consent” was sold as a way to protect the chastity of teenage girls after the sexual revolution established that any woman could “consent” to have sex with any man without consequences. To say that the age of consent now determines whether or not a man can be distracted by a half-naked teenager just reveals how stupid this all was to begin with.

We NEVER should have allowed the sexual liberation of women. It was STUPID and the main focus of the Feminine is to be sexual all the time, for sexual attention. Jews just understood this more than anyone else, it seems, and have effectively weaponized it, successfully.

Hey, here’s a question: if the woman doesn’t desire to purposefully manipulate men, then why is she showing off her body in the first place? Surely, maybe it was an accident the first time and she didn’t think about it, but when men say “you coming to school half-naked is distracting me, because I’m a man and my biology reacts to visuals of women in states of undress,” a polite girl would say “oh, okay – sorry about that, I’ll cover my body in the future”, but there is no such thing as a “polite girl”, because that would actually entail her being able to think and process information. As we know here, women are incapable of doing this.

But, no, they demand the right to show off their bodies. What reason could they have for wanting to do this, other than to manipulate men?

This is where we get into the total retardation of modern Christian/conservative conceptions of women and sexuality. She is not innocent. She knows what she’s doing. She is able to see that men’s eyes are drawn to her body, she is able to see that it makes them uncomfortable, she is able to see that if she shows off her body, she gets completely different reactions from men. She understands all of that. Female sexual innocence is a stupid myth. There is no such thing as female sexual innocence, because as soon as she goes outside half naked, she immediately understands the reactions she is getting.



Women use their sexuality to control and manipulate men. That IS sexual harassment. A woman who refuses to clothe herself in an appropriate way IS engaging in industrial-scale sexual harassment of men and needs to be beaten.

There is one solution to this problem, and it begins with “back” and ends with “kitchen.” it definitely entails beating women, because they truly deserve it.

The other solution is simply to enact strict laws about women’s dress, and then beat them when they start claiming that their victims are actually predators. All solutions entail beating women. There is no escaping it.

And yes, there is a difference between a man’s body and a woman’s body. Women’s bodies cause sexual arousal in men. Men’s bodies do not really cause sexual arousal in women, because women have tiny levels of testosterone. This is basic science.

Also, men rarely walk around showing off their midriffs in the first place, so the argument doesn’t even reflect the practical reality any more than it reflects the scientific reality.

Getting half naked and then saying “stop sexualizing our bodies” is no different than grabbing someone’s arm and slapping them with it and saying “stop hitting yourself!”

It is exactly the kind of cognitive delusions and dishonesty Instagram whores engage in. The same occurs with women at the gym. They wear the tightest, skimpiest and most revealing of clothing, yet have the gaul to claim that they are there to work out and that they’re serious about fitness. Depending on other whores and manginas to cosign the lie, because the more of them there are means, what you know to be fucking obvious, ceases to be and is actually what they say. That shit has never been convincing to me, so I go to the gym late at night to avoid these childish, brainless, attention seeking cunts.

This is what women do with “liberation.” They use it to sexually harass and exploit men. If you tell a woman “you can be whatever you want to be,” they reply with “I want to dress up like a slut and get all the men to stare at me and then accuse them of being perverts, except for the really handsome ones, who I will then manipulate into thinking I will have sex with them.”

If we do not control these sluts then we are utterly doomed. They can use their bodies to accomplish any goal by manipulating weak men. The only men who can resist them are those whose spirits are hardened by Male Sovereignty. Men who understand that women are totally fucking stupid.